I'm sure most of you have heard about the #OscarSoWhite "controversy". In a nutshell the Oscars have been politicised and subsequently accused of being "whitewashed" (racist term, the irony never ceases to amaze me) as there have been no black artists nominated this time around. Naturally this has caused a knee jerk reaction with "diversity" as the agenda with people like Jada Pinkett Smith and Spike Lee speaking out against the Oscars.
Spike Lee & Jada Pinkett Smith are skipping the Oscars because of #OscarSoWhite controversy https://t.co/sLQjv1z89m pic.twitter.com/KEcqqPYuj7— People Magazine (@people) January 18, 2016
Huh, black people boycotting the Oscars. That'll increase diversity...
Perhaps we could tackle this "issue" by including more black representation within the academy itself rather than expecting people to vote for movies and actors that they might not personally like. However, we'd then just have black film snobs instead of white film snobs voting for movies they like. That doesn't solve the real problem with the Oscars and the elitist attitude of Hollywood in general. I think a better solution would to simply increase the diversity in movies available, and I don't mean "blackwashing" already existing franchises or gender swapping established characters. I mean creating original content that appeals to other demographics. However, even then you're still reliant on the subjective opinions of the Academy and the demographic is consists of, whether that be blacks, whites, Asians, women, Drow, whatever. The system is flawed. this much is true.
Regardless, it's not racist. You cannot and should not simply award someone a prize based on the colour of their skin.
This opinion has been mimicked by Michael Caine and the hysterical Social Justice rags have immediately revealed their own prejudices in protest: "Old white actors don’t get the Oscars’ diversity problem. That’s why it’s a problem." ...dear god. Fighting apparent racism with racism and ageism? The hypocrisy is palpable. Aren't racism, ageism, sexism, ableism (and whatever other "ism" that's been invented these days to stage an ourcry) things that they're meant to be championing against? I don't particularly care I just wish they were consistent with their outrage. Caine hasn't misunderstood anything, and this misplaced character assassination doesn't fool me. Whether you're calling for diversity in either the awards themselves or the nominations, both of these things (as the author pointed out) gives an actor a boost to his or her career. Asking to be considered for nomination purely based on skin colour is still special treatment. Any boost to an actors career, via a nomination for a prestigious award or the award itself, should be earned.
Here's what Caine said:
"You can’t vote for an actor because he’s black. You can’t just say, 'I’m going to vote for him. He’s not very good, but he’s black. I’ll vote for him.’ You have to give a good performance,"Spot on, Sir.
Problems with how elitist the Oscars are aside, an Oscar is an award. An award for achievement. In other words: A meritocracy. Where are all the calls for NBA to be more inclusive of 5'2" white guys? Is someone going complain that the starting line of the 100m sprint in the Olympics isn't diverse enough? This is daft. Surely in order to be awarded you need to have achieved something? Being black is not an achievement, like how being white is not a privilege. These concepts are fucking racist.
Oh, the humanity! #OscarsSoWhite pic.twitter.com/RiTJcVSDRF— Larry Elder (@larryelder) January 22, 2016
Yes, even a nomination has a positive impact on an actors's career, but if you want a boost to your career via this method: Act better. Earn it. Or more accurately: Act in accordance with the subjective opinions of a few thousand film snobs.
Welcome to fucking Hollywood.
No comments:
Post a Comment